| the casual workplace is my friend |
[May. 17th, 2012|05:49 pm] |
Super professional ways I have responded to work requests in the last week:
"yesss. yes? yes"
"This might cause UTTER CHAOS. Let's find out together!"
"I guess I don't see a problem with this.... I GUESS"
"weird"
"Hahahahaha. I have no idea."
Never promote me to client-facing. |
|
|
| Young Nathan Fillion |
[Apr. 23rd, 2012|12:52 pm] |
Anna: btw
 me: That is delightful. I love how Canadian cheesecake models leave the enormous sweatshirt on.
Anna: It was the 90s. Everyone left their sweatshirts on. |
|
|
| Are people illogical or cooperative? |
[Apr. 22nd, 2012|12:32 am] |
I read a lot of pop psychology nonfiction which means I get reintroduced to a lot of intro psych concepts. For example, the representativeness heuristic is the idea that people tend to overestimate the likelihood that a situation will reflect a "representative" or stereotypical example, like when we see an argumentative toddler and predict she'll become a lawyer.
Consider the "Linda problem" (Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman): Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations.
Which is more probable?
1. Linda is a bank teller.
2. Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement. Logically, A is always more probable than A && B, and our desire to give answer #2 (A && B) could be an example of the representativeness bias (we want Linda to adhere to our representation of an activist rather than a bank teller), but, while I have no problem believing in the bias, I think this result could also be explained by our expectations of conversation, particularly if the test was given orally.
Linguistics sidebar!! This is my favorite thing to explain in linguistics, so you may have heard this from me already.
Paul Grice's "cooperativeness principle" proposes that people are generally cooperative in conversation and assume the same from their partner--that is, they're trying to contribute to a meaningful exchange of information, not just saying random shit for no reason. His conversational maxims, paraphrased by me: 1. Quantity: Give the right amount of information; don't say too much or too little. This is context-dependent, but, for example, giving cross-streets when a new acquaintance asks where you're from is wrong, as is saying "Oregon" when your cab driver asks where you want to go.
2. Quality: Be truthful
3. Relevance: Be relevant. Don't give unrelated information. This one can produce some creativity, as people will automatically do mental gymnastics to interpret anything you say as being relevant: hence the fun of turns of phrase such as "Is the pope Catholic?"
4. Manner: Be as orderly and straightforward as possible; "avoid unnecessary prolixity" (I remember that last phrase from Grice because it violates itself.) So if your friend were to describe Linda and ask you to guess her job and interests, you would assume that all the information he gave mattered to your answer, per the maxim of relevance. People normally don't give you unnecessary information. So that could have thrown off participants.
Further, when people answered the question, they were also trying to be cooperative, and to give as complete of an answer as they could, per the maxim of quantity. Only stating "A" when you have equal reason to believe "A && B" violates every conversational instinct. |
|
|
| New Blog |
[Apr. 18th, 2012|12:08 am] |
I started a new blog! Key Episodes is what it sounds like: I identify the minimal episodes you need to watch for all my favorite TV shows. It may have limited usefulness, but I'm having fun. |
|
|
| how to get |
[Apr. 17th, 2012|05:37 pm] |
Anna: lols if you type "how to get" into google, i get "how to get column number in excel" which i have actually searched for, but i also get "how to get married in skyrim" and "how to get rid of acne." neither of which i am interested in asking google :D
me: I don't get the excel thing. that must be you
Anna: yeah i ask a lot of "how do i get excel to do blah" me: I also get "how to get married in skyrim", "how to get rid of acne" and "how to get a girl to like you" Anna: good! me: if I type "how do I get," the first two are "how do I get facebook timeline" and "how do I get rid of facebook timeline"
Anna: those are the universe of options! |
|
|
| If only I lived in Ann Arbor |
[Apr. 14th, 2012|01:33 pm] |
There's a niche out there for a nice, well-designed, searchable, consumer-oriented fair trade clothing site. Everything is this little fly-by-night boutique with a selection of about four things. It'll be a mismatch of one dress, one bracelet, and a couple of T-shirts with birds on them, or else super-traditional printed robes which scream "LOOK HOW ETHNIC I, A WHITE PERSON, AM BEING!" So far the following seem promising, although I haven't tried to buy anything yet.
Global Girlfriend Some potentially cute things, reasonable prices but not a wide selection. Emphasis on using proceeds to fund microgrants, so that's nice. The Hunger Site and Trade For Change seem to have extremely overlapping selection.
Mata Traders are maybe the best at the moment - interesting products, okay prices. To the extent that super Facebook advertiser ModCloth has fair trade clothing, it's by these guys.
Indigenous Designs has a nice, slick site that makes me feel like they are a real company, but they have like, one dress.
Avatar Imports seem to have some cute things but no size chart??
Fair Indigo Good sale prices, small selection.
World of Good by Ebay Ebay is probably actually just the best thing to do- type in "fair trade." This is a good storefront with a lot of items at varying prices, but nothing I really want. |
|
|
| Blog entry most likely to be too obscure for any other human |
[Mar. 25th, 2012|10:43 pm] |
If the Just A Minute! regulars decided to record a radio play of the Sarah Caudwell mysteries, this would be the cast.
Hilary Tamar - Jenny Eclair or Julian Clary (your choice) Julia Larwood - Josie Lawrence Michael Cantrip - Paul Merton Selena Jardine - Sue Perkins Desmond Ragwort - Kit Hesketh-Harvey Basil Ptarmigan - Nicholas Parsons
I just thought you should know. |
|
|
| Dragon Age: Dream |
[Mar. 25th, 2012|10:19 am] |
In case the Dragon Age 3 writers are stumped, I think I dreamed a pretty good opening! You start trapped in an DARKSPAWN-INFESTED TOWER with no armor. Your only possession is some sort of COOL INHERITED MAGIC WEAPON (presumably class-specific). Your jailer is an OPPRESSED ELF who will look the other way while you run in exchange for your DA1-STYLE SURFER NECKLACE. In an awesome action/stealth sequence, you defeat and loot various guards, becoming more and more powerful as you descend levels of the tower. Along the way, you meet a COOL MERCENARY TANK, a fellow badass escapee with whom you can ally although he insists that he always works alone. You can flirt with him. Just before you make good your escape, you are captured by the scary EVIL QUEEN, a human wizard with some sort of unholy alliance with the darkspawn. She is more condescending than angry and you get the feeling she was toying with you by letting you get so far. You can hate-flirt with her. You regain consciousness back in your cell with none of your cool stuff. You have the same jailer from before--a short, shaggy-haired elf rogue with a new surfer necklace, a world-weary Irish accent, and the ironic name of "Chipper." You can definitely flirt with him.
That's as far as I got and it's probably only about five minutes into the game (more if you exhaust all the romance dialogue options), but they were five pretty fun minutes! Maybe tomorrow night I'll get the first boss fight. |
|
|
| Donovan |
[Mar. 10th, 2012|02:01 am] |
Most of my meeting notes descend into chaos and darkness, but last time I chose a cohesive theme: hobbity 60s folksinger I just learned about on an episode of Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour. All the girls threw flowers at him.
 |
|
|
| Everybody loves these OKC posts, right? |
[Mar. 8th, 2012|04:37 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | okc | ] |
| [ | music |
| | St. Jimmy | ] |
Just a couple more observations, and then I'll go back to not bothering with dating as usual, I assume.
My top 5 OKC match questions that come up most often as "unacceptable answers" for other people- Does the idea of flipping a coin to make important life decisions appeal to you? I said "yes." I see this one all the time. I don't know why it's such a problem for people. I guess they don't want to think I might break up with them on the basis of a coin flip, but I only did that ONCE.
- How important is it to you that a potential partner continues to educate himself/herself as an adult? I said "Not at all important." I guess it's nice for people to develop and grow, but I also sort of think formal education is a racket. My theory is that an adamant "Very important" here is a better predictor than age of how emotionally close you still are to college.
- Your significant other is perfectly content with their minimum wage job and has no plans to look for more challenging/better paying work. Is this a problem? Same problem as above, really. I said I would be fine with it, which is a problem for people because... I don't know... they don't want me to let them be content?? I don't think life fulfillment needs to come out of work or that the amount of money you get is the ultimate determiner of fulfillment; of course, what I SAID on this question was, "I don't think you understand - they can get me into the movies for FREE and ALL THE MILK DUDS I WANT"
- How often do you do things out of spite? I said "Sometimes." I can't actually think of an example, but "Never" seems so definitive. Most people say "Never" is the only acceptable answer here. I blame the question. We need to come up with a neutral euphemism for spite, like "dynamic contrariness" or "funvenge."
- Are you going to run away as soon as it's commitment time? Granted, I knew "Yes" was the wrong answer going in.
My Narcissistic List of My Own Top 20 Favorite OKC Match Q&A Explanations (In Case They Disappear Tomorrow)OKC allows you to add a personal explanation to each question. I have added an unnecessary ton of them. ( Highlights of my insufferability ) |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|